Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 500 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
EQS 500 120 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,682 kg3,708 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score74/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 500 120 kWh
- Highest torque828 Nm611 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 449hp335kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 828Nm611lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,682kg3,708lb | 2,555kg5,633lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 3,060kg6,746lb |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.8s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 60.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.4s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 176hp/t131kW/t80hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 324Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 492km306mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,038cc307cu in | - |
| Length | 4,789mm189in | 5,216mm205in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,382mm54in | 1,512mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,720mm107in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,642mm65in | 1,667mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,682mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 408L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,770L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.4 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW |
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 500 120 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 500 120 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | 828 Nm 611 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | 2,555 kg 5,633 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 500 120 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.3 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | 449 hp 335 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 500 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 449 hp 335 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 828 Nm 611 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb | 2,555 kg 5,633 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 492 km 306 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 176 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 873 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 92 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) EQS 500 120 kWh
- Has 299 Nm more
- Has 202 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























