Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWhvsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024

AMG EQS 53 125 kWh

761 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2024-2025
VS

Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017

GT/CS 5.0 V8

450 hp5038 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedLiftback / fastback2022-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    761 hp
    567 kW
  • Highest torque
    1,020 Nm
    752 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    288 hp/t
    215 kW/t
    3.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    620 L
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
761hp567kW
450hp336kW
Torque
1,020Nm752lb-ft
529Nm390lb-ft
Curb weight
2,640kg5,820lb
1,682kg3,708lb
Gross weight
3,225kg7,110lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
249 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
46.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
54.8s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
4.3s
0-200 km/h
12.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.2s
Calculated
4.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
288hp/t215kW/t131hp/1000 lb
Calculated
268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
386Nm/t259lb-ft/ton
Calculated
315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
492km306mi
Calculated
Displacement-
5,038cc307cu in
Length
5,223mm206in
4,789mm189in
Width
1,926mm76in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,520mm60in
1,382mm54in
Wheelbase
3,210mm126in
2,720mm107in
Front track
1,660mm65in
1,642mm65in
Rear track
1,653mm65in
1,642mm65in
Ground clearance
139mm5in
144mm6in
Trunk volume
620L
408L
Max trunk volume
1,700L
-
Doors
5
2
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank-
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.2 s
4.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
4.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
12.2 s
16.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
249 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.4 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
10.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
195 km/h
121 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh has 311 hp more than Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh: 311 hp (232 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
249 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 0.9 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
761 hp
567 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
450 hp
336 kW
4.3 s
249 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
Power
761 hp
567 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.3 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,789 mm
188.5 in
Height
1,382 mm
54.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWhFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
761 hp
567 kW
450 hp
336 kW
Torque
1,020 Nm
752 lb-ft
529 Nm
390 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
4.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
2,640 kg
5,820 lb
1,682 kg
3,708 lb
Fuel consumption
-
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
620 L
21.9 cu ft
Length
5,223 mm
205.6 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,789 mm
188.5 in
Height
1,382 mm
54.4 in
Range score
-
492 km
306 mi
Trunk score
620 L
21.9 cu ft
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
288 hp/t
215 kW/t
3.5 kg/hp
268 hp/t
200 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh

  • Has 311 hp more
  • Has 491 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 212 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
Ford Mustang VI GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) · Facelift 2024 AMG EQS 53 125 kWh vs Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster