IM L6 · Facelift 2025
Car comparison
IM L6 · Facelift 2025 100 kWhvsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.7 s
- Fastest top speed268 km/h167 mph
- Most powerful787 hp587 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight350 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk457 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,682 kg3,708 lb
- Best economy score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 787hp587kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 1,682kg3,708lb |
| Gross weight | 2,700kg5,952lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 36.4s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph Calculated | 54.8s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.7s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.3s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.6s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 356Nm/t238lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 492km306mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,937mm194in | 4,789mm189in |
| Width | 1,960mm77in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,474mm58in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,950mm116in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,665mm66in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 457L | 408L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,300L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 2 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.6 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.7 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.3 s | 16.4 s |
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.8 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 210 km/h 131 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 787 hp 587 kW |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh has 337 hp more than Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh: 337 hp (251 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 2,250 kg 4,960 lb |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 2.7 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 1.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | 787 hp 587 kW | 2.7 s | 268 km/h 167 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.3 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | IML6Facelift 2025100 kWh | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 787 hp 587 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.7 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 268 km/h 167 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,250 kg 4,960 lb | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 492 km 306 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 457 L 16.1 cu ft | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
IM L6 Facelift 2025 100 kWh
- Has 337 hp more
- Has 271 Nm more
- Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 82 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Is 568 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























