Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Ford Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8vsFord Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Fastest top speed249 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque529 Nm390 lb-ft
- Lightest1,682 kg3,708 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk408 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score62/100
Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range504 km313 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,682kg3,708lb | 1,732kg3,818lb |
| Gross weight | 2,105kg4,641lb | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 54.8s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 57.6s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.3s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.4s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.1s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated | 305Nm/t204lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 492km306mi Calculated | 504km313mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,038cc307cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,789mm189in | 4,789mm189in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,382mm54in | 1,396mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,720mm107in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,642mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 144mm6in | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 408L | 332L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.3 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.4 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,732 kg 3,818 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 492 km 306 mi |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 504 km 313 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.3 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.8 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.3 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 249 km/h 155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb | 1,732 kg 3,818 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 492 km 306 mi | 504 km 313 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | 332 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 | Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 76 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























