Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63vsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253)

AMG GLC 63

476 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2017-2019
VS

Ford Mustang Mach-E

GT 98.7 kWh

487 hpElectricAWDAutomaticCoupe2020-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,935 kg
    4,266 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    246 hp/t
    183 kW/t
    4.1 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    76/100
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best economy score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
476hp355kW
487hp363kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
830Nm612lb-ft
Curb weight
1,935kg4,266lb
2,273kg5,011lb
Gross weight
2,590kg5,710lb
2,717kg5,990lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
53.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
49.2s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.0s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
13.8s
Calculated
25.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.8s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
12.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
246hp/t183kW/t112hp/1000 lb
Calculated
214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton
Calculated
365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
617km383mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
-
Length
4,745mm187in
4,743mm187in
Width-
1,881mm74in
Height
1,578mm62in
1,613mm64in
Wheelbase
2,873mm113in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,684mm66in
1,622mm64in
Rear track
1,669mm66in
1,630mm64in
Ground clearance-
130mm5in
Trunk volume-
402L
Max trunk volume-
1,420L
Doors
4
5
Seats
4
5
Fuel tank
66L
-
CO2 emissions
244g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.8 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.0 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.8 s
25.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.2 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.9 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.1 s
10.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
12.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
189 km/h
117 mph
168 km/h
104 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
476 hp
355 kW
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW

Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has 11 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
830 Nm
612 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
2,273 kg
5,011 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 634.0 s
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh4.4 s

Although Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 and Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh: 0.4 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
476 hp
355 kW
4.0 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
487 hp
363 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63
Power
476 hp
355 kW
0-100 km/h4.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,578 mm
62.1 in
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
487 hp
363 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh
Power
476 hp
355 kW
487 hp
363 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
830 Nm
612 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.0 s
4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,935 kg
4,266 lb
2,273 kg
5,011 lb
Fuel consumption
10.7 L/100 km
22.0 mpg US
26.4 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
4 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,578 mm
62.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Length
4,743 mm
186.7 in
Height
1,613 mm
63.5 in
Range score
617 km
383 mi
-
CO2 score
244 g/km
-
Trunk score
-
402 L
14.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
246 hp/t
183 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
214 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Consumption10.7 L/100 km22 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km18.72 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi30.13 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,605 L424 US gal353 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,809 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63

  • Is 338 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG GLC 63
AMG GLC 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)Facelift 2019AMG GLC 63 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
Dark Horse 5.0 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsFordMustang VIIDark Horse 5.0 V8
AMG GLC 63
AMG GLC 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C254)AMG GLC 43
GT 98.7 kWh
S 95 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsAUDIe-tron SportbackS 95 kWh
AMG GLC 63
S 560
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)Facelift 2017S 560
GT 98.7 kWh
AMG C 63 V8
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018AMG C 63 V8
AMG GLC 63
AMG C 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)AMG C 63 V8
AMG GLC 63
S 500 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)S 500 V8
GT 98.7 kWh
90 kWh
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsLexusLF-Z Electrified Concept90 kWh
AMG GLC 63
GLE 500
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzGLE Coupe (C292)GLE 500
GT 98.7 kWh
3.0
VS
FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWhvsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
AMG GLC 63
AMG E 53
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLC Coupe (C253)AMG GLC 63vsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)AMG E 53
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe (C253) AMG GLC 63 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster