Zeekr 001 · Facelift 2025
Car comparison
Zeekr 001 · Facelift 2025 103 kWhvsFord Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang Mach-E
GT 98.7 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Zeekr 001 Facelift 2025 103 kWh
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful503 hp375 kW
- Lightest2,235 kg4,927 lb
- Best power-to-weight225 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk740 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 503hp375kW | 487hp363kW |
| Torque | 535Nm395lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,235kg4,927lb | 2,276kg5,018lb |
| Gross weight | 2,695kg5,941lb | 2,719kg5,994lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 41.9s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 21.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 214hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 417Nm/t279lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,977mm196in | 4,743mm187in |
| Width | 1,999mm79in | 1,881mm74in |
| Height | 1,545mm61in | 1,613mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 3,005mm118in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,703mm67in | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,716mm68in | 1,630mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 170mm7in | 127mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 740L | 402L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,144L | 1,420L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 21.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 113 mph | 174 km/h 108 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW |
Zeekr 001 Facelift 2025 103 kWh has 16 hp more than Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Zeekr 001 Facelift 2025 103 kWh: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | 535 Nm 395 lb-ft |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | 5.0 s |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 3.8 s |
Although Zeekr 001 Facelift 2025 103 kWh has more power, Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh and Zeekr 001 Facelift 2025 103 kWh: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | 503 hp 375 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | 487 hp 363 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Zeekr001Facelift 2025103 kWh | FordMustang Mach-EGT 98.7 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 503 hp 375 kW | 487 hp 363 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 535 Nm 395 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 215 km/h134 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,235 kg 4,927 lb | 2,276 kg 5,018 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 740 L 26.1 cu ft | 402 L 14.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 214 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Zeekr 001 Facelift 2025 103 kWh
- Has 16 hp more
- Is 41 kg lighter
- Has 80 km/h (50 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 338 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Ford Mustang Mach-E GT 98.7 kWh
- Has 415 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























