Car comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsFord Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche Macan I (95B)

2.0

252 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016

2.0 EcoBoost

242 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Most powerful
    252 hp
    188 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    172 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    878 km
    546 mi
  • Largest trunk
    500 L
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
252hp188kW
242hp180kW
Torque
370Nm273lb-ft
394Nm291lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,702kg3,752lb
Gross weight
2,445kg5,390lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
88.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
30.9s
Calculated
50.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
878km546mi
Calculated
690km429mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,697mm185in
4,531mm178in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,838mm72in
Height
1,624mm64in
1,703mm67in
Wheelbase
2,807mm111in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,655mm65in
1,573mm62in
Rear track
1,651mm65in
1,583mm62in
Ground clearance
185mm7in
-
Trunk volume
500L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,500L
1,653L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
172g/km
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.05,000-6,800 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm7,050 rpm
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost5,000 rpm2,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.9 s
50.8 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
242 hp
180 kW

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
394 Nm
291 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
1,702 kg
3,752 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
229 km/h
142 mph
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.06.7 s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
878 km
546 mi
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
690 km
429 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
252 hp
188 kW
6.7 s
229 km/h
142 mph
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
242 hp
180 kW
8.8 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,531 mm
178.4 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.7 s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorscheMacan I (95B)2.0FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
252 hp
188 kW
242 hp
180 kW
Torque
370 Nm
273 lb-ft
394 Nm
291 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,702 kg
3,752 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,624 mm
63.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,531 mm
178.4 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in
Range score
878 km
546 mi
690 km
429 mi
CO2 score
172 g/km
199 g/km
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche Macan I (95B) 2.0Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 189 km (117 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 44 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 27 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 24 Nm more
  • Is 68 kg lighter

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
Ford Kuga II 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20182.0
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
2.0
2.0
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheMacan I (95B)Facelift 20212.0
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0d
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0
3.0 diesel V6
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIFacelift 20143.0 diesel V6
2.0 EcoBoost
Sport 2.0 T
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 T5
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0
2.0 BiTDI
VS
PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 EcoBoost
3.3 MPi
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
2.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 T5
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 vs Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster