Ford GT
Car comparison
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32VvsMercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz CLK (C209) · Facelift 2005
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Most powerful507 hp378 kW
- Highest torque678 Nm500 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight350 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score92/100
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
- Lowest city consumption23.3 L/100 km10.1 mpg US12.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score77/100
- Best economy score66/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507hp378kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 678Nm500lb-ft | 630Nm465lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,995kg4,398lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.5s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 85.7s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.3s Calculated | 13.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 30L/100 km7.8mpg US9.4mpg UK | 23.3L/100 km10.1mpg US12.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 301hp/t224kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated | 374Nm/t250lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 405km252mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,409cc330cu in | 6,208cc379cu in |
| Length | 4,645mm183in | 4,657mm183in |
| Width | 1,955mm77in | 1,833mm72in |
| Height | 1,125mm44in | 1,365mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,715mm107in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,620mm64in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 435L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.3 s | 13.8 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 507 hp 378 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 3.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 507 hp 378 kW | 3.8 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | Mercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp 378 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.3 L/100 km 15.4 mpg US 18.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 405 km 252 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 301 hp/t 224 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 43.09 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,295 L606 US gal505 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,016 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Has 48 Nm more
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 49 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mercedes-Benz CLK (C209) Facelift 2005 AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























