Lamborghini Murcielago
Car comparison
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48VvsFord GT 5.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord GT
5.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Highest torque678 Nm500 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Lowest city consumption30.0 L/100 km7.8 mpg US9.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption14.0 L/100 km16.8 mpg US20.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph
- Most powerful580 hp433 kW
- Best power-to-weight352 hp/t262 kW/t2.8 kg/hp
- Best economy score0/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 580hp433kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 650Nm479lb-ft | 678Nm500lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 2,000kg4,409lb | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 56.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 52.1s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.5s Calculated | 10.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption city | 32.6L/100 km7.2mpg US8.7mpg UK | 30L/100 km7.8mpg US9.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15.1L/100 km15.6mpg US18.7mpg UK | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 352hp/t262kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 394Nm/t264lb-ft/ton Calculated | 468Nm/t313lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,192cc378cu in | 5,409cc330cu in |
| Length | 4,580mm180in | 4,645mm183in |
| Width | 2,045mm81in | 1,955mm77in |
| Height | 1,140mm45in | 1,125mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,665mm105in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,695mm67in | 1,620mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 7,500 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 44.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 580 hp 433 kW |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 507 hp 378 kW |
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V has 73 hp more than Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: 73 hp (54 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 322 km/h 200 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 3.9 s |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 3.8 s |
Although Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V has more power, Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 352 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | 580 hp 433 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 507 hp 378 kW | 3.8 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniMurcielago6.2 V12 48V | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 580 hp 433 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 330 km/h 205 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 352 hp/t 262 kW/t 2.8 kg/hp | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2 V12 48V
- Has 73 hp more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























