Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsZeekr 009 116 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Zeekr 009

116 kWh

340 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Zeekr 009 116 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    373 Nm
    275 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    574 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostZeekr009116 kWh
Power
240hp179kW
340hp254kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
373Nm275lb-ft
Curb weight
1,658kg3,655lb
2,770kg6,107lb
Gross weight
2,585kg5,699lb
-
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
109.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
43.5s
Calculated
47.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
135Nm/t90lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
886km551mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
-
Length
4,848mm191in
5,209mm205in
Width
1,916mm75in
2,024mm80in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,812mm71in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
3,205mm126in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,702mm67in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,714mm67in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
142mm6in
Trunk volume
300L
574L
Max trunk volume
2,339L
2,979L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
-
CO2 emissions
180g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostZeekr009116 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.5 s
47.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
Zeekr009116 kWh
340 hp
254 kW

Zeekr 009 116 kWh has 100 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Zeekr 009 116 kWh: 100 hp (75 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Zeekr009116 kWh
373 Nm
275 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Zeekr009116 kWh
2,770 kg
6,107 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph
Zeekr009116 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s
Zeekr009116 kWh7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 009 116 kWh and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Zeekr009116 kWh
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph
Zeekr009116 kWh
340 hp
254 kW
7.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Zeekr009116 kWh
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,209 mm
205.1 in
Height
1,812 mm
71.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostZeekr009116 kWh
Power
240 hp
179 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
7.9 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,209 mm
205.1 in
Height
1,812 mm
71.3 in
Range score
886 km
551 mi
-
CO2 score
180 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 1,112 kg lighter
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Zeekr 009 116 kWh

  • Has 100 hp more
  • Has 28 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 274 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost vs Zeekr 009 116 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster