Ford Galaxy III
Car comparison
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsZeekr 009 116 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonZeekr 009
116 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque373 Nm275 lb-ft
- Largest trunk574 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,658 kg3,655 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | Zeekr009116 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 345Nm254lb-ft | 373Nm275lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,658kg3,655lb | 2,770kg6,107lb |
| Gross weight | 2,585kg5,699lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 109.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.5s Calculated | 47.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 135Nm/t90lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 886km551mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,848mm191in | 5,209mm205in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 2,024mm80in |
| Height | 1,747mm69in | 1,812mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 3,205mm126in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,714mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 142mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 574L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,339L | 2,979L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 180g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | Zeekr009116 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.5 s | 47.0 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
Zeekr 009 116 kWh has 100 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Zeekr 009 116 kWh: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 2,770 kg 6,107 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 8.6 s |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 009 116 kWh and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Zeekr009116 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 7.9 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Zeekr009116 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost | Zeekr009116 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 345 Nm 254 lb-ft | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,658 kg 3,655 lb | 2,770 kg 6,107 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 886 km 551 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 180 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 574 L 20.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
- Is 1,112 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 28 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 274 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























