Car comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TSI

220 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    226 km/h
    140 mph
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    959 km
    596 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
220hp164kW
240hp179kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
96.0s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
38.3s
Calculated
43.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
959km596mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,854mm191in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,904mm75in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,746mm69in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,920mm115in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,571mm62in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,617mm64in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
300L
300L
Max trunk volume
2,297L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions-
180g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.3 s
43.5 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
226 km/h
140 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI7.8 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
959 km
596 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
220 hp
164 kW
7.8 s
226 km/h
140 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,746 mm
68.7 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
220 hp
164 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
220 hp
164 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.6 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,746 mm
68.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
959 km
596 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
-
180 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Has 5 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 73 km (45 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 57 kg lighter
  • Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
220i
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster