Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsToyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Toyota Alphard III · Facelift 2018

3.5 V6

300 hp3456 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2018-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Fastest top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightest
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Best power-to-weight
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Best estimated range
886 km
551 mi
Best economy score
86/100

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.3 s
Most powerful
300 hp
224 kW
Highest torque
361 Nm
266 lb-ft
Best overall score
65/100
Best performance score
50/100
Best practicality score
96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
Power	240hp179kW	300hp224kW
Torque	345Nm254lb-ft	361Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight	1,658kg3,655lb	2,125kg4,685lb
Gross weight	2,585kg5,699lb	2,675kg5,897lb
Top speed	222 km/h 138 mph	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated
To 99% top speed	99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated	95.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.6s	8.3s
0-200 km/h	43.5s Calculated	56.9s Calculated
0-60 mph	8.1s Calculated	7.8s Calculated
Fuel consumption	7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK	10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK	14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK	8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.2s Calculated	16.0s Calculated
Power-to-weight	145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated	141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated	170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	886km551mi Calculated	619km385mi Calculated
Displacement	1,999cc122cu in	3,456cc211cu in
Length	4,848mm191in	4,945mm195in
Width	1,916mm75in	1,850mm73in
Height	1,747mm69in	1,945mm77in
Wheelbase	2,849mm112in	3,000mm118in
Front track	1,606mm63in	-
Rear track	1,606mm63in	-
Ground clearance	124mm5in	160mm6in
Trunk volume	300L	-
Max trunk volume	2,339L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	7
Fuel tank	70L	65L
CO2 emissions	180g/km	-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostToyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	5,400 rpm	2,300-4,900 rpm	5,650 rpm
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	6,600 rpm	4,600-4,700 rpm	6,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.1 s	7.8 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.6 s	8.3 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	43.5 s	56.9 s
Top speed	222 km/h 138 mph	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.6 s	2.5 s
330 ft 101 m	7.0 s	6.8 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.6 s	10.3 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.7 s	13.4 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.2 s	16.0 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	142 km/h 88 mph	140 km/h 87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	240 hp 179 kW
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	300 hp 224 kW

Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 has 60 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	345 Nm 254 lb-ft
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	361 Nm 266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	1,658 kg 3,655 lb
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	2,125 kg 4,685 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	222 km/h 138 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	8.6 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	8.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6 and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	886 km 551 mi
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	619 km 385 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	240 hp 179 kW	8.6 s	222 km/h 138 mph
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	300 hp 224 kW	8.3 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 222 km/h 138 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	300 L 10.6 cu ft
Length	4,848 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,747 mm 68.8 in

ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	8.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,945 mm 194.7 in
Height	1,945 mm 76.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

Power	240 hp 179 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 222 km/h 138 mph

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6

Power	300 hp 224 kW
0-100 km/h	8.3 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

10.5 L/100 km

22.4 mpg US

26.9 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK	8.6 s
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK	8.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost	145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK
ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6	141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp	10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost

ToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6

Power

240 hp

179 kW

300 hp

224 kW

Torque

345 Nm

254 lb-ft

361 Nm

266 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.6 s

8.3 s

Top speed

222 km/h

138 mph

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

Lightness

1,658 kg

3,655 lb

2,125 kg

4,685 lb

Fuel consumption

7.9 L/100 km

29.8 mpg US

35.8 mpg UK

10.5 L/100 km

22.4 mpg US

26.9 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	300 L 10.6 cu ft
Length	4,848 mm 190.9 in
Height	1,747 mm 68.8 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	-
Length	4,945 mm 194.7 in
Height	1,945 mm 76.6 in

Range score

886 km

551 mi

619 km

385 mi

CO2 score

180 g/km

Trunk score

300 L

10.6 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

145 hp/t

108 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

141 hp/t

105 kW/t

7.1 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost	Toyota Alphard III Facelift 2018 3.5 V6
Consumption	7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK	10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	13.83 LC100 km	18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	22.25 LC100 mi	29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal	1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,074 LC/year	2,756 LC/year