Car comparison

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6vsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II)

3.5 V6

241 hp3498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedMinivan / MPV2006-2010
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Highest torque
    345 Nm
    254 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    180 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    886 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
241hp180kW
240hp179kW
Torque
330Nm243lb-ft
345Nm254lb-ft
Curb weight
1,845kg4,068lb
1,658kg3,655lb
Gross weight
2,545kg5,611lb
2,585kg5,699lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
109.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
98.7s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
43.0s
Calculated
43.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.6s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.9s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
692km430mi
Calculated
886km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,498cc213cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,656mm183in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,728mm68in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,803mm110in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,574mm62in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,556mm61in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
120mm5in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
291L
300L
Max trunk volume
2,860L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
83L
70L
CO2 emissions
284g/km
180g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V66,000 rpm3,600 rpm6,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.6 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.0 s
43.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.9 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
241 hp
180 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 has 1 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
225 km/h
140 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V68.1 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost and Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6: 4.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
692 km
430 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
241 hp
180 kW
8.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,728 mm
68.0 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Power
241 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
8.1 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
241 hp
180 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
330 Nm
243 lb-ft
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
8.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,845 kg
4,068 lb
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
Fuel consumption
12.0 L/100 km
19.6 mpg US
23.5 mpg UK
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
291 L
10.3 cu ft
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,728 mm
68.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
692 km
430 mi
886 km
551 mi
CO2 score
284 g/km
180 g/km
Trunk score
291 L
10.3 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
97 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleRenault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.00 LC100 km13.83 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.80 LC100 mi22.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,150 LC/year2,074 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 15 Nm more
  • Is 187 kg lighter
  • Uses 4.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 194 km (121 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 9 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 104 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V6
3.5i V6 24V
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsRenaultEspace IV3.5i V6 24V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
1.8 Energy TCe
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsRenaultEspace V1.8 Energy TCe
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
3.5 V6
2.5 i 20V
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
3.5 V6
B 200 Turbo
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
3.5 V6
B 200 Turbo
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)B 200 Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
3.5 V6
1.4 TSI
VS
RenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6vsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Renault Espace IV (PHASE II) 3.5 V6 vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster