Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS

XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026

110 kWh

537 hpElectricAWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    537 hp
    400 kW
  • Highest torque
    640 Nm
    472 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    189 hp/t
    141 kW/t
    5.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    71/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurboXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
240hp179kW
537hp400kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
640Nm472lb-ft
Curb weight
1,704kg3,757lb
2,845kg6,272lb
Gross weight
2,620kg5,776lb
-
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
96.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
63.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
48.6s
Calculated
38.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,111km690mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
-
Length
4,848mm191in
5,316mm209in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,988mm78in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,785mm70in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
3,160mm124in
Front track
1,606mm63in
-
Rear track
1,606mm63in
-
Ground clearance
124mm5in
-
Trunk volume
300L
-
Max trunk volume
2,339L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
70L
-
CO2 emissions
163g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurboXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.6 s
38.3 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
537 hp
400 kW

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 297 hp more than Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 297 hp (221 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
640 Nm
472 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
2,845 kg
6,272 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
216 km/h
134 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 2.8 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
8.7 s
216 km/h
134 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
537 hp
400 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
537 hp
400 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurboXPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh
Power
240 hp
179 kW
537 hp
400 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
640 Nm
472 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
5.9 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
2,845 kg
6,272 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in
Range score
1,111 km
690 mi
-
CO2 score
163 g/km
-
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
189 hp/t
141 kW/t
5.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh

  • Has 297 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 2.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 48 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
XPENG X9 110 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo vs XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster