BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06)
Car comparison
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220dvsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 110 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026
110 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Most powerful537 hp400 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score96/100
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 537hp400kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 640Nm472lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,565kg3,450lb | 2,845kg6,272lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | - |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 91.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 63.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 42.3s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 96hp/t71kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,102km685mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,386mm173in | 5,316mm209in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,988mm78in |
| Height | 1,576mm62in | 1,785mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 3,160mm124in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 171mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 415L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,405L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 42.3 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 537 hp 400 kW |
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh has 387 hp more than BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d.
The biggest power difference is between BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh: 387 hp (289 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 2,845 kg 6,272 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 8.3 s |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh and BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d: 2.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | 537 hp 400 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d | XPENGX9Facelift 2026110 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 537 hp 400 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | 2,845 kg 6,272 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,102 km 685 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 96 hp/t 71 kW/t 10.4 kg/hp | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW 2 Series Active Tourer (U06) 220d
- Is 1,280 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 110 kWh
- Has 387 hp more
- Has 280 Nm more
- Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 93 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























