Car comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010

2.0 EcoBoost

203 hpGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2014
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo

  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    141 hp/t
    105 kW/t
    7.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Largest trunk
    300 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
203hp151kW
240hp179kW
Torque-
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,661kg3,662lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
107.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
96.5s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
46.5s
Calculated
48.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
864km537mi
Calculated
1,111km690mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,903mm193in
4,848mm191in
Width
2,154mm85in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,660mm65in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase-
2,849mm112in
Front track-
1,606mm63in
Rear track-
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
285L
300L
Max trunk volume
2,000L
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions-
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.5 s
48.6 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
140 km/h
87 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
240 hp
179 kW

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo has 37 hp more than Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 37 hp (28 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
221 km/h
137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
216 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost8.5 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo8.7 s

Although Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo has more power, Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo and Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
864 km
537 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
1,111 km
690 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
203 hp
151 kW
8.5 s
221 km/h
137 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
8.7 s
216 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
Power
203 hp
151 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
216 km/h
134 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Power
203 hp
151 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
-
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.7 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
216 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,661 kg
3,662 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
8.1 L/100 km
29.0 mpg US
34.9 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
285 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
4,903 mm
193.0 in
Height
1,660 mm
65.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
864 km
537 mi
1,111 km
690 mi
CO2 score
-
163 g/km
Trunk score
285 L
10.1 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoostFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Consumption8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.17 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.81 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,126 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford S-MAX Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 43 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo

  • Has 37 hp more
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 247 km (153 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford S-MAX 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
225i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-TurbovsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
Ford S-MAX · Facelift 2010 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster