Volkswagen Bora IV
Car comparison
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSIvsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
2.0 TDCi
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score45/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,364 km847 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,315kg2,899lb | 1,462kg3,223lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 69.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.3s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.9s Calculated | 47.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 8.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.0s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km575mi Calculated | 1,364km847mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,395cc85cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,815mm71in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,462mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,688mm106in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | - | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 126mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 506L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 115g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-3,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.9 s | 47.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.0 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 1,462 kg 3,223 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 8.3 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 926 km 575 mi |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 1,364 km 847 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.3 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi |
| 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenBora IV1.4 280TSI | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20142.0 TDCi | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.3 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | 1,462 kg 3,223 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km 53.5 mpg US 64.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 575 mi | 1,364 km 847 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 115 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 7.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 12.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 660 L174 US gal145 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,155 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Bora IV 1.4 280TSI
- Is 147 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 2.0 TDCi
- Has 120 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 438 km (272 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























