Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoostvsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
1.5 T3
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,358 kg2,994 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.6 s
- Most powerful152 hp113 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,164 km723 mi
- Largest trunk380 L
- Best practicality score71/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 152hp113kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,358kg2,994lb | 1,533kg3,380lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 71.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.4s Calculated | 45.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 177Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 982km610mi Calculated | 1,164km723mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,534mm179in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,823mm72in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,648mm104in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,585mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 372L | 380L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 128g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5,000 rpm | 1,700-4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.4 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 11.0 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 150 hp 112 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 has 2 hp more than Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 9.0 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 982 km 610 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 1,164 km 723 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 152 hp 113 kW | 8.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20131.5 T3 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 152 hp 113 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,358 kg 2,994 lb | 1,533 kg 3,380 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 982 km 610 mi | 1,164 km 723 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 128 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 1.5 T3
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
- Has 8 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























