Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoostvsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 408 II
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Most powerful167 hp125 kW
- Highest torque245 Nm181 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,334 kg2,941 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range932 km579 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 167hp125kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,334kg2,941lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.2s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.6s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 932km579mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,534mm179in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,823mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,648mm104in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 372L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.2 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 11.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.6 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 150 hp 112 kW |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW |
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP has 17 hp more than Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost and Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 9.0 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 932 km 579 mi |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 167 hp 125 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 932 km 579 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 km (21 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























