Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
1.5 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.6 L/100 km65.3 mpg US78.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions109 g/km
- Best estimated range1,341 km834 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score96/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,334 kg2,941 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,555kg3,428lb | 1,334kg2,941lb |
| Gross weight | 2,190kg4,828lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 38.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,341km834mi Calculated | 932km579mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,534mm179in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,823mm72in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,544mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 372L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 109g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 38.2 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 150 hp 112 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d has 13 hp more than Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 8.7 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 9.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 1,341 km 834 mi |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 932 km 579 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.7 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d |
| 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK |
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0d | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,555 kg 3,428 lb | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.1 L/100 km 57.4 mpg US 68.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,341 km 834 mi | 932 km 579 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 109 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.1 L/100 km57.4 mpg US68.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.17 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 11.55 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 615 L162 US gal135 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,076 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 409 km (254 mi) more estimated range
- Has 133 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Is 221 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























