Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsFord Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTwin-turboSedan2015-2018
VS

Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014

1.5 EcoBoost

182 hp1499 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,731 km
    1,075 mi
  • Largest trunk
    380 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Power
190hp142kW
182hp136kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,561kg3,441lb
1,334kg2,941lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
73.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
27.2s
Calculated
35.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,731km1,075mi
Calculated
982km610mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,499cc91cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,534mm179in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,823mm72in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,484mm58in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,544mm61in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,559mm61in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
-
Trunk volume
380L
372L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
55L
CO2 emissions-
137g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
27.2 s
35.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
3.0 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 8 hp more than Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,561 kg
3,441 lb
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
1,334 kg
2,941 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D47.6 s
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 1.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,731 km
1,075 mi
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
982 km
610 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.7 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
372 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,534 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
7.6 s
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
Power
190 hp
142 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,561 kg
3,441 lb
1,334 kg
2,941 lb
Fuel consumption
3.9 L/100 km
60.3 mpg US
72.4 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
372 L
13.1 cu ft
Length
4,534 mm
178.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Range score
1,731 km
1,075 mi
982 km
610 mi
CO2 score
-
137 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
372 L
13.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
136 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
Consumption3.9 L/100 km60.3 mpg US72.4 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.83 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.98 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used585 L155 US gal129 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,024 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Has 160 Nm more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 749 km (465 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 8 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Ford Focus III Sedan 1.5 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
1.5 EcoBoost
EcoBoost 245
VS
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoostvsFordTaurus VIIEcoBoost 245
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
1.5 EcoBoost
2.5
VS
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoostvsToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
1.5 EcoBoost
2.0d
VS
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoostvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolkswagenPassat (B8)2.0 TDI
1.5 EcoBoost
C 200
VS
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
2.0 D4
2.0d
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 D4
VS
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoostvsVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
2.0 D4
1.6 Energy TCe
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsRenaultTalisman1.6 Energy TCe
1.5 EcoBoost
E 200
VS
FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster