Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Ford Focus III Sedan · Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoostvsPeugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPeugeot 408 II
1.6 THP
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful182 hp136 kW
- Lightest1,334 kg2,941 lb
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range982 km610 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score92/100
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque245 Nm181 lb-ft
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 182hp136kW | 167hp125kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 245Nm181lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,334kg2,941lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 66.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.2s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 136hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 180Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 173Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 982km610mi Calculated | 898km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,534mm179in | 4,750mm187in |
| Width | 1,823mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,648mm104in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,544mm61in | 1,555mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 372L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.2 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW |
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost has 15 hp more than Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 8.2 s |
Although Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost has more power, Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP and Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 982 km 610 mi |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 898 km 558 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.7 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 167 hp 125 kW | 8.2 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot408 II1.6 THP | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 182 hp 136 kW | 167 hp 125 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,334 kg 2,941 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 982 km 610 mi | 898 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 372 L 13.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 136 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost | Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Focus III Sedan Facelift 2014 1.5 EcoBoost
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 81 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Peugeot 408 II 1.6 THP
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 83 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























