Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Porsche Cayenne III · Facelift 2023 3.0 V6vsFord Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Explorer VI
3.0 EcoBoost V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Most powerful353 hp263 kW
- Lightest2,055 kg4,530 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Largest trunk772 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Highest torque555 Nm409 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range2,476 km1,538 mi
- Best economy score99/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 353hp263kW | 349hp260kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 555Nm409lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,055kg4,530lb | 2,391kg5,271lb |
| Gross weight | 2,835kg6,250lb | 3,160kg6,967lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 82.5s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 80.9s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 24.0s | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 5.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 620km385mi Calculated | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,956cc180cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 5,049mm199in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 2,004mm79in |
| Height | 1,698mm67in | 1,778mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,895mm114in | 3,025mm119in |
| Front track | 1,676mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,653mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 193mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 772L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,708L | 2,274L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 5,400-6,400 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 5,750 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 24.0 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 has 4 hp more than Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 6.0 s |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6: 9.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 620 km 385 mi |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,476 km 1,538 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 353 hp 263 kW | 6.0 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
| 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6 | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 353 hp 263 kW | 349 hp 260 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,055 kg 4,530 lb | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 620 km 385 mi | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 772 L 27.3 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6 | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km | 5.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year | 761.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Cayenne III Facelift 2023 3.0 V6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 336 kg lighter
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 442 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Has 55 Nm more
- Uses 9.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1,856 km (1,153 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























