Car comparison

Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6vsLand Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 P360

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Explorer VI

3.0 EcoBoost V6

349 hp2956 ccHybridAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2019-2024
VS

Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017

3.0 P360

360 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    555 Nm
    409 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    2.9 L/100 km
    81.1 mpg US
    97.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    2,476 km
    1,538 mi
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    99/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
349hp260kW
360hp268kW
Torque
555Nm409lb-ft
495Nm365lb-ft
Curb weight
2,391kg5,271lb
2,267kg4,998lb
Gross weight
3,160kg6,967lb
3,140kg6,923lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
85.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.0s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
25.7s
Calculated
42.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.7s
Calculated
6.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.2s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
159hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
2,476km1,538mi
Calculated
1,130km702mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,956cc180cu in
2,996cc183cu in
Length
5,049mm199in
5,000mm197in
Width
2,004mm79in
2,073mm82in
Height
1,778mm70in
1,869mm74in
Wheelbase
3,025mm119in
2,922mm115in
Front track-
1,693mm67in
Rear track-
1,685mm66in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
297mm12in
Trunk volume
330L
900L
Max trunk volume
2,274L
2,190L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
72L
104L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360PowerTorque
  • Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V65,750 rpm3,500 rpm6,000 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P3605,500-6,500 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.7 s
6.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.0 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.7 s
42.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.2 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
349 hp
260 kW
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
360 hp
268 kW

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 has 11 hp more than Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: 11 hp (8 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
555 Nm
409 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
495 Nm
365 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
2,391 kg
5,271 lb
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
2,267 kg
4,998 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V66.0 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P3606.9 s

Although Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 has more power, Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
2.9 L/100 km
81.1 mpg US
97.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360: 6.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
2,476 km
1,538 mi
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
1,130 km
702 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
349 hp
260 kW
6.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
360 hp
268 kW
6.9 s
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
Power
349 hp
260 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
5,049 mm
198.8 in
Height
1,778 mm
70.0 in
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
Power
349 hp
260 kW
0-100 km/h6.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
2.9 L/100 km
81.1 mpg US
97.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
360 hp
268 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
2.9 L/100 km
81.1 mpg US
97.4 mpg UK
6.0 s
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
2.9 L/100 km
81.1 mpg US
97.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360
Power
349 hp
260 kW
360 hp
268 kW
Torque
555 Nm
409 lb-ft
495 Nm
365 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.0 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Unrestricted
215 km/h134 mph
Restricted
209 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,391 kg
5,271 lb
2,267 kg
4,998 lb
Fuel consumption
2.9 L/100 km
81.1 mpg US
97.4 mpg UK
9.2 L/100 km
25.6 mpg US
30.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
5,049 mm
198.8 in
Height
1,778 mm
70.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Length
5,000 mm
196.9 in
Height
1,869 mm
73.6 in
Range score
2,476 km
1,538 mi
1,130 km
702 mi
Trunk score
330 L
11.7 cu ft
900 L
31.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
159 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360
Consumption2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km5.08 LC100 km16.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi8.17 LC100 mi25.91 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used435 L115 US gal96 UK gal1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal
Annual fuel cost761.25 LC/year2,415 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1,345 km (836 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover IV Facelift 2017 3.0 P360

  • Has 11 hp more
  • Is 124 kg lighter
  • Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 570 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
Land Rover Range Rover IV 3.0 P360
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 EcoBoost V6
40d
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsBMWX7 (G07)40d
3.0 P360
EQS 450+ 120 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360vsMercedes-BenzEQS SUV (X296)EQS 450+ 120 kWh
3.0 EcoBoost V6
GLS 450
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 450
3.0 P360
3.0i
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i
3.0 EcoBoost V6
55 TFSI V6
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)55 TFSI V6
3.0 P360
3.0 V6
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360vsPorscheCayenne III3.0 V6
3.0 EcoBoost V6
2.0 GDI
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsMaseratiLevante2.0 GDI
3.0 EcoBoost V6
50 95 kWh
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsAUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh
3.0 P360
570 V8
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015570 V8
3.0 EcoBoost V6
50 95 kWh
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsAUDIQ8 e-tron Sportback50 95 kWh
3.0 EcoBoost V6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TSI
3.0 P360
55 95 kWh
VS
Land RoverRange Rover IVFacelift 20173.0 P360vsAUDIe-tron55 95 kWh
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 vs Land Rover Range Rover IV · Facelift 2017 3.0 P360 - car comparison - FastVsFaster