Car comparison

Zeekr 009 116 kWhvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Zeekr 009

116 kWh

340 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2024-present
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Zeekr 009 116 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    123 hp/t
    92 kW/t
    8.1 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    574 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelZeekr009116 kWhFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
340hp254kW
170hp127kW
Torque
373Nm275lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,770kg6,107lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight-
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
108.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
46.7s
Calculated
50.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
135Nm/t90lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement-
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,209mm205in
4,379mm172in
Width
2,024mm80in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,812mm71in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase
3,205mm126in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,702mm67in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,714mm67in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
142mm6in
-
Trunk volume
574L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,979L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank-
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricZeekr009116 kWhFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
46.7 s
50.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
340 hp
254 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Zeekr 009 116 kWh has 170 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Zeekr 009 116 kWh: 170 hp (127 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh7.9 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Zeekr 009 116 kWh and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.6 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Zeekr009116 kWh
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Zeekr009116 kWh
340 hp
254 kW
7.9 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Zeekr009116 kWh
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,209 mm
205.1 in
Height
1,812 mm
71.3 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleZeekr009116 kWhFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
340 hp
254 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
373 Nm
275 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
2,770 kg
6,107 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
-
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
574 L
20.3 cu ft
Length
5,209 mm
205.1 in
Height
1,812 mm
71.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
-
1,250 km
777 mi
Trunk score
574 L
20.3 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Zeekr 009 116 kWh

  • Has 170 hp more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 142 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Zeekr 009 116 kWh
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

116 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
116 kWh
220d
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
116 kWh
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
116 kWh
1.5 TSI ACT
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
116 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
Zeekr009116 kWhvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Zeekr 009 116 kWh vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster