Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCivsXPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019
VS

XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026

94.8 kWh

347 hpElectricFWDAutomaticMinivan / MPV2026-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.2 s
  • Most powerful
    347 hp
    259 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    122 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiXPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
Power
170hp127kW
347hp259kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,444kg3,183lb
2,850kg6,283lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
-
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
87.8s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
99.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.2s
0-200 km/h
50.3s
Calculated
58.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
-
Length
4,379mm172in
5,316mm209in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,988mm78in
Height
1,610mm63in
1,785mm70in
Wheelbase
2,648mm104in
3,160mm124in
Front track
1,557mm61in
-
Rear track
1,569mm62in
-
Trunk volume
432L
-
Max trunk volume
1,684L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
60L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiXPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.3 s
58.9 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
347 hp
259 kW

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh has 177 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh: 177 hp (132 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
2,850 kg
6,283 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh8.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.3 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
347 hp
259 kW
8.2 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
Power
347 hp
259 kW
0-100 km/h8.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiXPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWh
Power
170 hp
127 kW
347 hp
259 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.2 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
2,850 kg
6,283 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,316 mm
209.3 in
Height
1,785 mm
70.3 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
-
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
122 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

XPENG X9 Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh

  • Has 177 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
XPENG X9 94.8 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
94.8 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWhvsToyotaAlphard IIIFacelift 20183.5 V6
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
94.8 kWh
220d
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWhvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
94.8 kWh
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWhvsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
94.8 kWh
1.5 TSI ACT
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWhvsVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
94.8 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
XPENGX9Facelift 202694.8 kWhvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi vs XPENG X9 · Facelift 2026 94.8 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster