Car comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Largest trunk
    885 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
200hp149kW
170hp127kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,790kg3,946lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
47.2s
Calculated
50.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,854mm191in
4,379mm172in
Width
1,904mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,720mm68in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase
2,919mm115in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,617mm64in
1,569mm62in
Trunk volume
885L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,430L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
196g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm5,350 rpm
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.2 s
50.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI8.3 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
833 km
518 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
8.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.3 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
885 L
31.3 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
196 g/km
-
Trunk score
885 L
31.3 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 453 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Is 346 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 417 km (259 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
2.0 TDCi
218d
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
2.0 TSI
B 200 Turbo
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster