Car comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2016
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    226 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Largest trunk
    955 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
200hp149kW
170hp127kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
3,260kg7,187lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
97.7s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph
Calculated
88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
38.7s
Calculated
50.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
959km596mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,854mm191in
4,379mm172in
Width
1,904mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,720mm68in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase
2,920mm115in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,571mm62in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,617mm64in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
955L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,430L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
168g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,450 rpm
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.7 s
50.5 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI has 30 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
226 km/h
140 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI: 2.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
959 km
596 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
226 km/h
140 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
7.8 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
200 hp
149 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.5 s
Top speed
226 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
959 km
596 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
168 g/km
-
Trunk score
955 L
33.7 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSIFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 523 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 271 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 291 km (181 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TSI vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster