Car comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDIvsFord C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,444 kg
    3,183 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
184hp137kW
170hp127kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
1,444kg3,183lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,050kg4,519lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
104.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.9s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
53.1s
Calculated
50.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,321km821mi
Calculated
1,250km777mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,854mm191in
4,379mm172in
Width
1,904mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,720mm68in
1,610mm63in
Wheelbase
2,920mm115in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,571mm62in
1,557mm61in
Rear track
1,617mm64in
1,569mm62in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
955L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,430L
1,684L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
60L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDIFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.9 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.1 s
50.5 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI has 14 hp more than Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
215 km/h
134 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI8.9 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s

Although Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI has more power, Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
1,321 km
821 mi
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
8.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.9 s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
184 hp
137 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.9 s
8.5 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
Fuel consumption
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Range score
1,321 km
821 mi
1,250 km
777 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
-
Trunk score
955 L
33.7 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDIFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
Consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.28 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.93 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used795 L210 US gal175 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,391 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 71 km (44 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 523 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 281 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TDI
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
2.0 TDI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI vs Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster