Nissan 300 ZX (Z32)
Car comparison
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin TurbovsFerrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari Mondial
3.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque375 Nm277 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk326 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best estimated range807 km501 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 283hp211kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 375Nm277lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,644kg3,624lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.0s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 625km388mi Calculated | 807km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,960cc181cu in | 3,405cc208cu in |
| Length | 4,520mm178in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,255mm49in | 1,235mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,570mm101in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,495mm59in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,555mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 96L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo: Power / Torque
- Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 6,400 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.0 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has 17 hp more than Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 5.9 s |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 6.3 s |
Although Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has more power, Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 625 km 388 mi |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 807 km 501 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 283 hp 211 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
| 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Nissan300 ZX (Z32)3.0 Twin Turbo | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 283 hp 211 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,644 kg 3,624 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 625 km 388 mi | 807 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo | Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan 300 ZX (Z32) 3.0 Twin Turbo
- Has 52 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 26 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 139 kg lighter
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 182 km (113 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























