Mitsubishi 3000 GT
Car comparison
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4vsFerrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari Mondial
3.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque407 Nm300 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,505 kg3,318 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286hp213kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 407Nm300lb-ft | 323Nm238lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 1,825kg4,023lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 81.9s99% target: 252 km/h / 157 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s Calculated | 23.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 807km501mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,972cc181cu in | 3,405cc208cu in |
| Length | 4,555mm179in | 4,535mm179in |
| Width | 1,840mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,235mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,560mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,560mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 160L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 96L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4: Power / Torque
- Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 6,000 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 23.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 255 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 173 km/h 108 mph | 163 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has 14 hp more than Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 255 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 5.0 s |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 6.3 s |
Although Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V has more power, Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4 and Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V: 1.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.3 s | 255 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mitsubishi3000 GT3.0 i 24V 4x4 | FerrariMondial3.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp 213 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 407 Nm 300 lb-ft | 323 Nm 238 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 255 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.9 L/100 km 19.8 mpg US 23.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 807 km 501 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.51 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,785 L472 US gal393 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,124 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0 i 24V 4x4
- Has 84 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari Mondial 3.4 i V8 32V
- Has 14 hp more
- Is 240 kg lighter
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 140 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























