Ferrari GTC4Lusso T
Car comparison
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8vsJaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-type Coupe
SVR 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful610 hp455 kW
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight351 hp/t261 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions265 g/km
- Best estimated range784 km487 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best practicality score57/100
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,705 kg3,759 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25.0 mpg UK
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 610hp455kW | 575hp429kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.3s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 55.5s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.8s | 10.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 351hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 337hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 437Nm/t292lb-ft/ton Calculated | 411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | 619km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,855cc235cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,922mm194in | 4,475mm176in |
| Width | 1,980mm78in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,383mm54in | 1,311mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 2,622mm103in |
| Front track | 1,674mm66in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,668mm66in | 1,611mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 408L |
| Doors | 3 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 91L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 265g/km | 269g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 3,000-5,250 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.8 s | 10.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 49.4 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 205 km/h 127 mph | 210 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 610 hp 455 kW |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 has 35 hp more than Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 and Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 322 km/h 200 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 3.5 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 351 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 784 km 487 mi |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 619 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 610 hp 455 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | 351 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8 | JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 610 hp 455 kW | 575 hp 429 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 322 km/h 200 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | 619 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 265 g/km | 269 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 351 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8 | Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari GTC4Lusso T 3.9 V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 165 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 42 L more trunk volume
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























