Ferrari F50
Car comparison
Ferrari F50 4.7 V12vsLamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLamborghini Diablo
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari F50 4.7 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed335 km/h208 mph Unrestricted325 km/h202 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Best power-to-weight423 hp/t315 kW/t2.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption22.9 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption37.9 L/100 km6.2 mpg US7.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption17.3 L/100 km13.6 mpg US16.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range437 km271 mi
- Best economy score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariF504.7 V12 | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 520hp388kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 471Nm347lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,230kg2,712lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Gross weight | 1,520kg3,351lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Calculated | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.6s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph Calculated | 57.3s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 28.1L/100 km8.4mpg US10.1mpg UK | 22.9L/100 km10.3mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 41.5L/100 km5.7mpg US6.8mpg UK | 37.9L/100 km6.2mpg US7.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 20.3L/100 km11.6mpg US13.9mpg UK | 17.3L/100 km13.6mpg US16.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.4s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 423hp/t315kW/t192hp/1000 lb Calculated | 338hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton Calculated | 382Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 374km232mi Calculated | 437km271mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,698cc287cu in | 5,992cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,480mm176in | 4,470mm176in |
| Width | 1,986mm78in | 2,040mm80in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,105mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,580mm102in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,620mm64in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,602mm63in | 1,670mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 140L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 105L | 100L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari F50 4.7 V12: Power / Torque
- Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 8,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 7,100 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariF504.7 V12 | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 35.0 s | 45.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph Likely limited | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.7 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.4 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 520 hp 388 kW |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 has 30 hp more than Ferrari F50 4.7 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 and Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 471 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 3.9 s |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 3.9 s |
Although Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 has more power, Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 and Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12: 0.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 28.1 L/100 km 8.4 mpg US 10.1 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 and Ferrari F50 4.7 V12: 5.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 423 hp/t 315 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 374 km 232 mi |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 437 km 271 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 520 hp 388 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 550 hp 410 kW | 3.9 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 |
| 28.1 L/100 km 8.4 mpg US 10.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 |
| 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 28.1 L/100 km 8.4 mpg US 10.1 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariF504.7 V12 | 423 hp/t 315 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 28.1 L/100 km 8.4 mpg US 10.1 mpg UK |
| LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariF504.7 V12 | LamborghiniDiablo6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 520 hp 388 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 471 Nm 347 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 335 km/h208 mph Restricted 325 km/h202 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 28.1 L/100 km 8.4 mpg US 10.1 mpg UK | 22.9 L/100 km 10.3 mpg US 12.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 374 km 232 mi | 437 km 271 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 423 hp/t 315 kW/t 2.4 kg/hp | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari F50 4.7 V12 | Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 28.1 L/100 km8.4 mpg US10.1 mpg UK | 22.9 L/100 km10.3 mpg US12.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 49.18 LC100 km | 40.07 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 79.14 LC100 mi | 64.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 4,215 L1,113 US gal927 UK gal | 3,435 L907 US gal756 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 7,376 LC/year | 6,011 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari F50 4.7 V12
- Is 395 kg lighter
- Is 0.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 84 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Lamborghini Diablo 6.0 V12
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 149 Nm more
- Uses 5.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 63 km (39 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























