Lamborghini Diablo
Car comparison
Lamborghini Diablo VTvsFerrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F40
2.9 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V
- Lightest1,100 kg2,425 lb
- Best power-to-weight435 hp/t324 kW/t2.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption17.9 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Lamborghini Diablo VT
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed325 km/h202 mph
- Most powerful492 hp367 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Best economy score66/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniDiabloVT | FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 492hp367kW | 478hp356kW |
| Torque | 580Nm428lb-ft | 577Nm426lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,100kg2,425lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Top speed | 325 km/h 202 mph | 324 km/h 201 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 62.7s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated | 51.5s99% target: 321 km/h / 199 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 10.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.2L/100 km15.5mpg US18.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 20L/100 km11.8mpg US14.1mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 11.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 303hp/t226kW/t137hp/1000 lb Calculated | 435hp/t324kW/t197hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 525Nm/t351lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,707cc348cu in | 2,936cc179cu in |
| Length | 4,460mm176in | 4,358mm172in |
| Width | 2,040mm80in | 1,970mm78in |
| Height | 1,105mm44in | 1,124mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,594mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,640mm65in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 125mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 120L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Diablo VT: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniDiabloVT | FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 10.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 63.3 s | 56.2 s |
| Top speed | 325 km/h 202 mph | 324 km/h 201 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 11.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 203 km/h 126 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 492 hp 367 kW |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 478 hp 356 kW |
Lamborghini Diablo VT has 14 hp more than Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V and Lamborghini Diablo VT: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 577 Nm 426 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 325 km/h 202 mph |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 324 km/h 201 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 4.1 s |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 435 hp/t 324 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT | 492 hp 367 kW | 4.1 s | 325 km/h 202 mph |
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | 478 hp 356 kW | 4.1 s | 324 km/h 201 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniDiabloVT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniDiabloVT | FerrariF402.9 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 492 hp 367 kW | 478 hp 356 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | 577 Nm 426 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 325 km/h 202 mph | 324 km/h 201 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,100 kg 2,425 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.2 L/100 km 15.5 mpg US 18.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 303 hp/t 226 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 435 hp/t 324 kW/t 2.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Diablo VT |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.2 L/100 km15.5 mpg US18.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,280 L602 US gal502 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,990 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Diablo VT
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari F40 2.9 i V8 32V
- Is 525 kg lighter
- Has 132 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























