Car comparison

Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8vsFerrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Koenigsegg CCX

4.8 V8

888 hp4800 ccGasolineRWDManualTwin-turbo2008-2010
VS

Ferrari F12tdf

6.3 V12

780 hp6262 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchNaturally aspiratedCoupe2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.9 s
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    15.4 L/100 km
    15.3 mpg US
    18.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    597 km
    371 mi
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best economy score
    66/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    400 km/h
    249 mph
  • Most powerful
    888 hp
    662 kW
  • Highest torque
    940 Nm
    693 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,280 kg
    2,822 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    694 hp/t
    517 kW/t
    1.4 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    96/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKoenigseggCCX4.8 V8FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
888hp662kW
780hp582kW
Torque
940Nm693lb-ft
705Nm520lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,415kg3,120lb
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
To 99% top speed
97.5s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph
Calculated
38.5s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.0s
2.9s
0-200 km/h
9.1s
7.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.9s
Calculated
2.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
10.6s
Calculated
10.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
694hp/t517kW/t315hp/1000 lb
Calculated
551hp/t411kW/t250hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
734Nm/t491lb-ft/ton
Calculated
498Nm/t333lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
412km256mi
Calculated
597km371mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,800cc293cu in
6,262cc382cu in
Length
4,293mm169in
4,656mm183in
Width
1,996mm79in
1,961mm77in
Height
1,114mm44in
1,273mm50in
Wheelbase-
2,720mm107in
Front track-
1,673mm66in
Rear track-
1,648mm65in
Ground clearance
95mm4in
-
Trunk volume
120L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
70L
92L
CO2 emissions-
360g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12PowerTorque
  • Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V87,000 rpm5,800 rpm7,250 rpm
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V128,500 rpm6,250 rpm8,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKoenigseggCCX4.8 V8FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.9 s
2.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.0 s
2.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.1 s
7.4 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
26.5 s
24.5 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.7 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
4.6 s
4.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.0 s
6.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.0 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.6 s
10.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
218 km/h
136 mph
239 km/h
148 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
888 hp
662 kW
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
780 hp
582 kW

Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8 has 108 hp more than Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8: 108 hp (81 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
940 Nm
693 lb-ft
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
705 Nm
520 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
1,415 kg
3,120 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
400 km/h
249 mph
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
340 km/h
211 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V83.0 s
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V122.9 s

Although Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8 has more power, Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
694 hp/t
517 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
412 km
256 mi
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
597 km
371 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
888 hp
662 kW
3.0 s
400 km/h
249 mph
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
780 hp
582 kW
2.9 s
340 km/h
211 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
Power
888 hp
662 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
340 km/h
211 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
Power
888 hp
662 kW
0-100 km/h3.0 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
780 hp
582 kW
0-100 km/h2.9 s
Top speed
340 km/h
211 mph
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
3.0 s
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK
2.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8
694 hp/t
517 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKoenigseggCCX4.8 V8FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12
Power
888 hp
662 kW
780 hp
582 kW
Torque
940 Nm
693 lb-ft
705 Nm
520 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.0 s
2.9 s
Top speed
400 km/h
249 mph
340 km/h
211 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,415 kg
3,120 lb
Fuel consumption
17.0 L/100 km
13.8 mpg US
16.6 mpg UK
15.4 L/100 km
15.3 mpg US
18.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
120 L
4.2 cu ft
Length
4,293 mm
169.0 in
Height
1,114 mm
43.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,656 mm
183.3 in
Height
1,273 mm
50.1 in
Range score
412 km
256 mi
597 km
371 mi
CO2 score
-
360 g/km
Trunk score
120 L
4.2 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
694 hp/t
517 kW/t
1.4 kg/hp
551 hp/t
411 kW/t
1.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKoenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Consumption17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.75 LC100 km26.95 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.88 LC100 mi43.37 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,463 LC/year4,043 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8

  • Has 108 hp more
  • Has 235 Nm more
  • Is 135 kg lighter
  • Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 143 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 186 km (115 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8
Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8 vs Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster