Koenigsegg Agera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8vsKoenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonKoenigsegg CCX
4.8 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful960 hp716 kW
- Highest torque1,100 Nm811 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range544 km338 mi
- Largest trunk120 L
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8
- Lightest1,280 kg2,822 lb
- Best power-to-weight694 hp/t517 kW/t1.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score96/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 960hp716kW | 888hp662kW |
| Torque | 1,100Nm811lb-ft | 940Nm693lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,280kg2,822lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 97.5s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.0s | 9.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 10.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 669hp/t499kW/t303hp/1000 lb Calculated | 694hp/t517kW/t315hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 767Nm/t513lb-ft/ton Calculated | 734Nm/t491lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 412km256mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,032cc307cu in | 4,800cc293cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,293mm169in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,996mm79in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,114mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,662mm105in | - |
| Front track | 1,700mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | - |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | 95mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 120L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 5,800 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.0 s | 9.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.0 s | 26.5 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 9.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 234 km/h 145 mph | 218 km/h 136 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 960 hp 716 kW |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 888 hp 662 kW |
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 has 72 hp more than Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8 and Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: 72 hp (54 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 940 Nm 693 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 3.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 and Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 694 hp/t 517 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 412 km 256 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 960 hp 716 kW | 3.0 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 888 hp 662 kW | 3.0 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 |
| 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | 694 hp/t 517 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | KoenigseggCCX4.8 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 960 hp 716 kW | 888 hp 662 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft | 940 Nm 693 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 400 km/h 249 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 17.0 L/100 km 13.8 mpg US 16.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 412 km 256 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 694 hp/t 517 kW/t 1.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 | Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 17 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 29.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 47.88 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,550 L674 US gal561 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 4,463 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8
- Has 72 hp more
- Has 160 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Koenigsegg CCX 4.8 V8
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























