Koenigsegg Agera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8vsFerrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F12tdf
6.3 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful960 hp716 kW
- Highest torque1,100 Nm811 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight669 hp/t499 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score67/100
Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best estimated range597 km371 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 960hp716kW | 780hp582kW |
| Torque | 1,100Nm811lb-ft | 705Nm520lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,415kg3,120lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 38.5s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.0s | 7.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 669hp/t499kW/t303hp/1000 lb Calculated | 551hp/t411kW/t250hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 767Nm/t513lb-ft/ton Calculated | 498Nm/t333lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 597km371mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,032cc307cu in | 6,262cc382cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,656mm183in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,273mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,662mm105in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,700mm67in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,648mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 92L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 360g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 8,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.0 s | 24.5 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 234 km/h 145 mph | 239 km/h 148 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 960 hp 716 kW |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 780 hp 582 kW |
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 has 180 hp more than Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: 180 hp (134 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 705 Nm 520 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 2.9 s |
Although Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 has more power, Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 and Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 597 km 371 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 960 hp 716 kW | 3.0 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 780 hp 582 kW | 2.9 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 |
| 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | 2.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | FerrariF12tdf6.3 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 960 hp 716 kW | 780 hp 582 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft | 705 Nm 520 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km 15.3 mpg US 18.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 597 km 371 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 360 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 551 hp/t 411 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 | Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 26.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 43.37 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,310 L610 US gal508 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 4,043 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8
- Has 180 hp more
- Has 395 Nm more
- Has 80 km/h (50 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 118 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ferrari F12tdf 6.3 V12
- Is 20 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























