Koenigsegg Agera
Car comparison
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8vsFerrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F12 Berlinetta
6.3 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.0 s
- Fastest top speed420 km/h261 mph
- Most powerful960 hp716 kW
- Highest torque1,100 Nm811 lb-ft
- Lightest1,435 kg3,164 lb
- Best power-to-weight669 hp/t499 kW/t1.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score67/100
Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12
- Lowest highway consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range613 km381 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score76/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 960hp716kW | 740hp552kW |
| Torque | 1,100Nm811lb-ft | 690Nm509lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,435kg3,164lb | 1,525kg3,362lb |
| Gross weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | - |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.9s99% target: 416 km/h / 258 mph Calculated | 41.4s99% target: 337 km/h / 209 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 3.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.0s | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 3.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22.9L/100 km10.3mpg US12.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 10.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 669hp/t499kW/t303hp/1000 lb Calculated | 485hp/t362kW/t220hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 767Nm/t513lb-ft/ton Calculated | 452Nm/t303lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 544km338mi Calculated | 613km381mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,032cc307cu in | 6,262cc382cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,618mm182in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,942mm76in |
| Height | 1,120mm44in | 1,273mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,662mm105in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,700mm67in | 1,665mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,650mm65in | 1,618mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 500L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 92L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 350g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 7,100 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 8,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 3.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 3.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 20.0 s | 26.3 s |
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.6 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 10.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 234 km/h 145 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 960 hp 716 kW |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW |
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 has 220 hp more than Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8: 220 hp (164 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 340 km/h 211 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 3.0 s |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 3.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 and Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 485 hp/t 362 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 544 km 338 mi |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 613 km 381 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 960 hp 716 kW | 3.0 s | 420 km/h 261 mph |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 740 hp 552 kW | 3.1 s | 340 km/h 211 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 3.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | 485 hp/t 362 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggAgera5.0 V8 | FerrariF12 Berlinetta6.3 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 960 hp 716 kW | 740 hp 552 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,100 Nm 811 lb-ft | 690 Nm 509 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 3.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 420 km/h 261 mph | 340 km/h 211 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,435 kg 3,164 lb | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 544 km 338 mi | 613 km 381 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 350 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 669 hp/t 499 kW/t 1.5 kg/hp | 485 hp/t 362 kW/t 2.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8 | Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.72 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.40 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,205 L582 US gal485 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,859 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg Agera 5.0 V8
- Has 220 hp more
- Has 410 Nm more
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 80 km/h (50 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 184 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari F12 Berlinetta 6.3 V12
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























