Lamborghini Murcielago LP640
Car comparison
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48VvsFerrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 599 GTB Fiorano
6.0 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12
- Lightest1,688 kg3,721 lb
- Best power-to-weight367 hp/t274 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range665 km413 mi
- Largest trunk320 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score65/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed338 km/h210 mph
- Most powerful640 hp477 kW
- Highest torque660 Nm487 lb-ft
- Best performance score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 640hp477kW | 620hp462kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 608Nm448lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,830kg4,034lb | 1,688kg3,721lb |
| Gross weight | 2,015kg4,442lb | - |
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 52.9s99% target: 335 km/h / 208 mph Calculated | 69.0s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.2s Calculated | 11.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.9s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb Calculated | 367hp/t274kW/t167hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 361Nm/t241lb-ft/ton Calculated | 360Nm/t241lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 469km292mi Calculated | 665km413mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 6,496cc396cu in | 5,999cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,610mm181in | 4,666mm184in |
| Width | 2,058mm81in | 1,961mm77in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,336mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,665mm105in | 2,751mm108in |
| Front track | 1,635mm64in | 1,689mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,695mm67in | 1,618mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 320L |
| Max trunk volume | 140L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 105L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 401g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 8,000 rpm | - | 8,250 rpm |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 7,600 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 8,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.2 s | 11.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 34.0 s | 53.7 s |
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.9 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 220 km/h 137 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 640 hp 477 kW |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 620 hp 462 kW |
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V has 20 hp more than Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12 and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 608 Nm 448 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 1,688 kg 3,721 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 338 km/h 210 mph |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 3.4 s |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 3.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V and Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12 and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V: 5.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 469 km 292 mi |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 665 km 413 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 640 hp 477 kW | 3.4 s | 338 km/h 210 mph |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 620 hp 462 kW | 3.7 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V |
| 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 |
| 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK |
| Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V | Ferrari599 GTB Fiorano6.0 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 640 hp 477 kW | 620 hp 462 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 608 Nm 448 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 338 km/h 210 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | 1,688 kg 3,721 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.3 L/100 km 11.0 mpg US 13.3 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km 14.9 mpg US 17.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 469 km 292 mi | 665 km 413 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 401 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 320 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 350 hp/t 261 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 367 hp/t 274 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V | Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK | 15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.29 LC100 km | 27.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 60.02 LC100 mi | 44.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,197 L844 US gal703 UK gal | 2,370 L626 US gal521 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,594 LC/year | 4,148 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 52 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari 599 GTB Fiorano 6.0 V12
- Is 142 kg lighter
- Uses 5.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 195 km (121 mi) more estimated range
- Has 180 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























