Ferrari 550 Maranello
Car comparison
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12vsFerrari California 30 4.3 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California
30 4.3 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range595 km370 mi
- Largest trunk340 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score49/100
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Highest torque569 Nm420 lb-ft
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight287 hp/t214 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best performance score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485hp362kW | 490hp365kW |
| Torque | 569Nm420lb-ft | 505Nm372lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.7s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 59.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.5s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 24.4L/100 km9.6mpg US11.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 38.2L/100 km6.2mpg US7.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 282hp/t211kW/t128hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated | 291Nm/t195lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 467km290mi Calculated | 595km370mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,474cc334cu in | 4,297cc262cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,562mm180in |
| Width | 1,935mm76in | 1,909mm75in |
| Height | 1,277mm50in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,632mm64in | 1,630mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,586mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 185L | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 114L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 299g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 7,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 7,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.5 s | 11.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 57.2 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.1 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 197 km/h 123 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW |
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 has 5 hp more than Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 and Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 4.4 s |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 11.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 467 km 290 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 595 km 370 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 490 hp 365 kW | 3.8 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
| 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 |
| 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | FerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp 362 kW | 490 hp 365 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km 18.0 mpg US 21.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 467 km 290 mi | 595 km 370 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 299 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | 340 L 12.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 282 hp/t 211 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 | Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 24.4 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.6 mpg UK | 13.1 L/100 km18 mpg US21.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 42.70 LC100 km | 22.93 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 68.72 LC100 mi | 36.89 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,660 L967 US gal805 UK gal | 1,965 L519 US gal432 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,405 LC/year | 3,439 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Has 64 Nm more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari California 30 4.3 V8
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 11.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 128 km (80 mi) more estimated range
- Has 155 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























