Ferrari 456M
Car comparison
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12vsFerrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari F355 GTS
3.5 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
- Fastest top speed310 km/h193 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful442 hp330 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range509 km316 mi
- Largest trunk316 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption26.1 L/100 km9.0 mpg US10.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.9 L/100 km19.8 mpg US23.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score62/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 442hp330kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,700kg3,748lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.4s99% target: 307 km/h / 191 mph Calculated | 63.8s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.5s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 21.6L/100 km10.9mpg US13.1mpg UK | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 35.1L/100 km6.7mpg US8.0mpg UK | 26.1L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 244Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 509km316mi Calculated | 485km301mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,474cc334cu in | 3,496cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,763mm188in | 4,250mm167in |
| Width | 1,920mm76in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,170mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,514mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,615mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 119mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 316L | 220L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 110L | 82L |
| CO2 emissions | 495g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
- Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 8,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.5 s | 14.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 380 hp 283 kW |
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 has 62 hp more than Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8 and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 62 hp (46 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 5.2 s |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 4.7 s |
Although Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 has more power, Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8 and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8 and Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 509 km 316 mi |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 485 km 301 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 380 hp 283 kW | 4.7 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 |
| 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK |
| FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari456MGT 5.5 V12 | FerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 442 hp 330 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 310 km/h193 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 21.6 L/100 km 10.9 mpg US 13.1 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 509 km 316 mi | 485 km 301 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 495 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 316 L 11.2 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12 | Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 21.6 L/100 km10.9 mpg US13.1 mpg UK | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 37.80 LC100 km | 29.57 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 60.83 LC100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,240 L856 US gal713 UK gal | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,670 LC/year | 4,436 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 456M GT 5.5 V12
- Has 62 hp more
- Has 187 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 24 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 96 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Ferrari F355 GTS 3.5 V8
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























