Ferrari Testarossa
Car comparison
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48VvsFerrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 456
GTA 5.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful442 hp330 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight250 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,700 kg3,748 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption23.2 L/100 km10.1 mpg US12.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,009 km627 mi
- Best economy score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 442hp330kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.7s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 84.3s99% target: 295 km/h / 183 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 29.8L/100 km7.9mpg US9.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 250hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,009km627mi Calculated | 611km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,942cc302cu in | 5,474cc334cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,730mm186in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,920mm76in |
| Height | 1,130mm44in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,600mm102in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 119mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 316L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 115L | 110L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 298 km/h 185 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 390 hp 291 kW |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW |
Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12 has 52 hp more than Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 298 km/h 185 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5.7 s |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12 and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12: 6.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 250 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,009 km 627 mi |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 611 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 442 hp 330 kW | 5.5 s | 298 km/h 185 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 |
| 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | 250 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari456GTA 5.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 442 hp 330 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 298 km/h 185 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 18.0 L/100 km 13.1 mpg US 15.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,009 km 627 mi | 611 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 316 L 11.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 250 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 18 L/100 km13.1 mpg US15.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 31.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 50.69 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 2,700 L713 US gal594 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 4,725 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 398 km (247 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Ferrari 456 GTA 5.5 V12
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























