Ferrari Testarossa
Car comparison
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48VvsFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 348 TB
3.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Fastest top speed300 km/h186 mph Unrestricted290 km/h180 mph Restricted
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque490 Nm361 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight229 hp/t171 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,009 km627 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Lightest1,393 kg3,071 lb
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 324Nm239lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,393kg3,071lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Calculated | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 92.7s99% target: 297 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 18.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 23.2L/100 km10.1mpg US12.2mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 229hp/t171kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,009km627mi Calculated | 760km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,942cc302cu in | 3,405cc208cu in |
| Length | 4,485mm177in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,130mm44in | 1,170mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,502mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,660mm65in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 115L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 6,300 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 18.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph Likely limited | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 390 hp 291 kW |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has 90 hp more than Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 90 hp (67 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 5.7 s |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 5.6 s |
Although Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V has more power, Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 and Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 1,009 km 627 mi |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 760 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.6 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariTestarossa4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 300 km/h186 mph Restricted 290 km/h180 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,700 kg 3,748 lb | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,009 km 627 mi | 760 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 229 hp/t 171 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari Testarossa 4.9 i V12 48V
- Has 90 hp more
- Has 166 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 249 km (155 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
- Is 307 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























