DS 4 Crossback
Car comparison
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THPvsVolvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V40 Cross Country
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lightest1,387 kg3,058 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t113 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Largest trunk359 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful213 hp159 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best performance score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 213hp159kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,387kg3,058lb | 1,624kg3,580lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 2,070kg4,564lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 102.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 82.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.1s Calculated | 37.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 704km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,284mm169in | 4,370mm172in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,857mm73in |
| Height | 1,535mm60in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,612mm103in | 2,646mm104in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,552mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 359L | 335L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 189g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 6,000 rpm | 2,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.1 s | 37.6 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 has 3 hp more than DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 8.4 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 and DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP and Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5: 2.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 704 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 213 hp 159 kW | 7.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 |
| 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS4 Crossback1.6 THP | VolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 213 hp 159 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | 1,624 kg 3,580 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km 29.0 mpg US 34.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 704 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 189 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 359 L 12.7 cu ft | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP | Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 8.1 L/100 km29 mpg US34.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 14.17 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 22.81 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,215 L321 US gal267 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 2,126 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP
- Is 237 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 313 km (195 mi) more estimated range
- Has 24 L more trunk volume
- Emits 51 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo V40 Cross Country 2.0 T5
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























