DS 4
Car comparison
DS 4 1.6 THPvsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 4 1.6 THP
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Largest trunk359 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DS41.6 THP | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,387kg3,058lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.8s Calculated | 28.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 733km456mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,284mm169in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,502mm59in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,612mm103in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 359L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 941L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 4 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS41.6 THP | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.8 s | 28.2 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
DS 4 1.6 THP has 18 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and DS 4 1.6 THP: 18 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 8.4 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.9 s |
Although DS 4 1.6 THP has more power, Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and DS 4 1.6 THP: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 733 km 456 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.9 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS41.6 THP | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 733 km 456 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 359 L 12.7 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 4 1.6 THP | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 4 1.6 THP
- Has 18 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 284 km (176 mi) more estimated range
- Has 81 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























