DS 4
Car comparison
DS 4 1.6 THPvsVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Beetle (A5) · Facelift 2016
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 4 1.6 THP
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,017 km632 mi
- Largest trunk359 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,376 kg3,034 lb
- Best power-to-weight160 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score55/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DS41.6 THP | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 285Nm210lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,387kg3,058lb | 1,376kg3,034lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.8s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,017km632mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,284mm169in | 4,288mm169in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,502mm59in | 1,488mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,612mm103in | 2,524mm99in |
| Front track | 1,532mm60in | 1,581mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,527mm60in | 1,553mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 136mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 359L | 310L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 905L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 4 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS41.6 THP | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.8 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI has 10 hp more than DS 4 1.6 THP.
The biggest power difference is between DS 4 1.6 THP and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 1,376 kg 3,034 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI and DS 4 1.6 THP: 1.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 4 1.6 THP and Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 1,017 km 632 mi |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 6.7 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS41.6 THP | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS41.6 THP | VolkswagenBeetle (A5)Facelift 20162.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 285 Nm 210 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,387 kg 3,058 lb | 1,376 kg 3,034 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,017 km 632 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 359 L 12.7 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 4 1.6 THP | Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 4 1.6 THP
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 208 km (129 mi) more estimated range
- Has 49 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Beetle (A5) Facelift 2016 2.0 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 65 Nm more
- Is 11 kg lighter
- Is 1.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























