Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR)
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6vsDodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDodge Caliber
SRT4 2.4 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
- Most powerful303 hp226 kW
- Highest torque352 Nm260 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight209 hp/t156 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk524 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed248 km/h154 mph
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 303hp226kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 352Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,617kg3,565lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 246 km/h / 153 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.9s Calculated | 24.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 584km363mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,189cc195cu in | 2,360cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,246mm167in | 4,414mm174in |
| Width | 1,759mm69in | 1,747mm69in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,533mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,578mm101in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,535mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,515mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,230L | 1,360L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6: Power / Torque
- Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 6,300 rpm | 2,800-3,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.9 s | 24.7 s |
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 160 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 303 hp 226 kW |
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V has 53 hp more than Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 53 hp (40 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 6.2 s |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 6.7 s |
Although Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V has more power, Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V and Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 612 km 380 mi |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 584 km 363 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.2 s | 248 km/h 154 mph |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 303 hp 226 kW | 6.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf V (3-DOOR)R32 3.2 V6 | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 303 hp 226 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 248 km/h 154 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,617 kg 3,565 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 584 km 363 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6 | Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf V (3-DOOR) R32 3.2 V6
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
- Has 53 hp more
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 167 kg lighter
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 249 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























