Subaru WRX STI Hatchback
Car comparison
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5vsDodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDodge Caliber
SRT4 2.4 16V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
- Most powerful303 hp226 kW
- Highest torque352 Nm260 lb-ft
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight209 hp/t156 kW/t4.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range584 km363 mi
- Best economy score83/100
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Largest trunk1,130 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 303hp226kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 352Nm260lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,010kg4,431lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 74.4s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.3s Calculated | 24.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 209hp/t156kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 243Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 566km352mi Calculated | 584km363mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,457cc150cu in | 2,360cc144cu in |
| Length | 4,415mm174in | 4,414mm174in |
| Width | 1,795mm71in | 1,747mm69in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,533mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,625mm103in | 2,635mm104in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,520mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 1,130L | 524L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,360L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 52L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: Power / Torque
- Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6,200 rpm | 3,000-6,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.3 s | 24.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 161 km/h 100 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 303 hp 226 kW |
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V has 3 hp more than Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 245 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 6.0 s |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 6.7 s |
Although Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V has more power, Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 and Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V and Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 566 km 352 mi |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 584 km 363 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.0 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 303 hp 226 kW | 6.7 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 6.0 s |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
| DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SubaruWRX STI Hatchback2.5 | DodgeCaliberSRT4 2.4 16V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 303 hp 226 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 352 Nm 260 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 245 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 566 km 352 mi | 584 km 363 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 1,130 L 39.9 cu ft | 524 L 18.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 209 hp/t 156 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5 | Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Subaru WRX STI Hatchback 2.5
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 606 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Dodge Caliber SRT4 2.4 16V
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 2 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 18 km (11 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























