Car comparison

WEY 03 2.0LvsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

WEY 03

2.0L

204 hp1998 ccHybridAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

WEY 03 2.0L

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    0.5 L/100 km
    470.4 mpg US
    565.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    11,000 km
    6,835 mi
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelWEY032.0LCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204hp152kW
204hp152kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
2,220kg4,894lb
1,665kg3,671lb
Gross weight
2,670kg5,886lb
2,280kg5,027lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
75.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
7.1s
0-200 km/h
23.4s
Calculated
32.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
92hp/t69kW/t42hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
11,000km6,835mi
Calculated
750km466mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,668mm184in
4,519mm178in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,730mm68in
1,586mm62in
Wheelbase
2,745mm108in
2,681mm106in
Front track-
1,590mm63in
Rear track-
1,580mm62in
Trunk volume
517L
540L
Max trunk volume
1,289L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricWEY032.0LCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
7.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.4 s
32.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.4 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
164 km/h
102 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
204 hp
152 kW
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
2,220 kg
4,894 lb
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L5.3 s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between WEY 03 2.0L and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 1.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between WEY 03 2.0L and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 7.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
92 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.9 kg/hp
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
WEY032.0L
11,000 km
6,835 mi
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
750 km
466 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
WEY032.0L
204 hp
152 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
WEY032.0L
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
517 L
18.3 cu ft
Length
4,668 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,730 mm
68.1 in
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
WEY032.0L
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

WEY 03 2.0L is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
WEY032.0L
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
5.3 s
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
WEY032.0L
92 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.9 kg/hp
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleWEY032.0LCupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
204 hp
152 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
7.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
2,220 kg
4,894 lb
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
Fuel consumption
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
517 L
18.3 cu ft
Length
4,668 mm
183.8 in
Height
1,730 mm
68.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Range score
11,000 km
6,835 mi
750 km
466 mi
Trunk score
517 L
18.3 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
92 hp/t
69 kW/t
10.9 kg/hp
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleWEY 03 2.0LCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km0.88 LC100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi1.41 LC100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used75 L20 US gal16 UK gal1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost131.25 LC/year2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

WEY 03 2.0L

  • Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 7.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10,250 km (6,369 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Is 555 kg lighter
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 23 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
WEY 03 2.0L
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0L
2.0 TFSI
VS
WEY032.0LvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TSI
2.0L
2.0 TSI
VS
WEY032.0LvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
2.0L
S 2.0
VS
WEY032.0LvsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar2.0 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
2.0L
2.0 TSI
VS
WEY032.0LvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
2.0L
Standard Range 50 kWh
VS
WEY032.0LvsTeslaModel YStandard Range 50 kWh
2.0L
40 TFSI
VS
WEY032.0LvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TFSI
2.0L
GLB 220d
VS
WEY032.0LvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
2.0L
1.5i P300e
VS
WEY032.0LvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20201.5i P300e
2.0L
2.0 TSI
VS
WEY032.0LvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
WEY 03 2.0L vs Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster