Car comparison

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsHyundai Kona II 1.6T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Terramar

2.0 TSI

204 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Hyundai Kona II

1.6T

198 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    204 hp
    152 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraTerramar2.0 TSIHyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
204hp152kW
198hp148kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
2,280kg5,027lb
1,915kg4,222lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
73.1s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.1s
7.8s
0-200 km/h
32.7s
Calculated
47.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.7s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.1s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,519mm178in
4,350mm171in
Width
1,869mm74in
1,825mm72in
Height
1,586mm62in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,580mm62in
1,600mm63in
Trunk volume
540L
466L
Max trunk volume-
1,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
47L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIHyundai Kona II 1.6TPowerTorque
  • Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI4,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,400 rpm6,250 rpm
HyundaiKona II1.6T6,000 rpm1,600-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraTerramar2.0 TSIHyundaiKona II1.6T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.7 s
7.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.1 s
7.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
32.7 s
47.3 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.7 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.1 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
152 km/h
95 mph
146 km/h
91 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
HyundaiKona II1.6T
198 hp
148 kW

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 6 hp more than Hyundai Kona II 1.6T.

The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 6 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
HyundaiKona II1.6T
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
HyundaiKona II1.6T
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
225 km/h
140 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6T
209 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI7.1 s
HyundaiKona II1.6T7.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 0.7 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
HyundaiKona II1.6T
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
204 hp
152 kW
7.1 s
225 km/h
140 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6T
198 hp
148 kW
7.8 s
209 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraTerramar2.0 TSI
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h7.1 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
HyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
198 hp
148 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraTerramar2.0 TSIHyundaiKona II1.6T
Power
204 hp
152 kW
198 hp
148 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.1 s
7.8 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
123 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI

  • Has 6 hp more
  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 74 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Hyundai Kona II 1.6T

  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI vs Hyundai Kona II 1.6T - car comparison - FastVsFaster