Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSIvsHyundai Kona II 1.6T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Kona II
1.6T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 198hp148kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,280kg5,027lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 73.1s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.7s Calculated | 47.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,600mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.7 s | 47.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 198 hp 148 kW |
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI has 6 hp more than Hyundai Kona II 1.6T.
The biggest power difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6T and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Hyundai Kona II 1.6T: 0.7 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6T | 198 hp 148 kW | 7.8 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | HyundaiKona II1.6T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 198 hp 148 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 55 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 74 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Hyundai Kona II 1.6T
- Is 175 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























